Bentley v. Anderson-McGriff Hardware Co.
This text of 184 S.E. 297 (Bentley v. Anderson-McGriff Hardware Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. “This court will never pass upon the constitutionality of an act of the General Assembly unless it clearly appears in the record that the point was directly and properly made in the court below and distinctly passed on by the trial judge.” Brown v. State, 114 Ga. 60 (2) (39 S. E. 873); Griggs v. State, 130 Ga. 16 (60 S. E. 103).
(a) It is clear from the language of the judgment upon which error is assigned that the trial judge did not rule upon the constitutional question.
(5) Whether or not the constitutional question, having been raised for the first time in the response to the motion to dismiss the petition for certiorari, which the judge refused to allow, came too late to evoke consideration by the Supreme Court, need not be decided.
'2. As the bill of exceptions does not seek to review a judgment as to the constitutionality of a statute, and the case not involving any other question of which the Supreme Court would have jurisdiction, the case is transferred to the Court of Appeals, which has jurisdiction.
Transferred to Court of Appeals.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
184 S.E. 297, 181 Ga. 813, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bentley-v-anderson-mcgriff-hardware-co-ga-1936.