Tant v. State

177 S.E.2d 484, 226 Ga. 761, 1970 Ga. LEXIS 673
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 8, 1970
Docket26023, 26024
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 177 S.E.2d 484 (Tant v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tant v. State, 177 S.E.2d 484, 226 Ga. 761, 1970 Ga. LEXIS 673 (Ga. 1970).

Opinions

Grice, Justice.

Each of these appeals is from the conviction and sentence for the unlawful possession of marijuana. The appellants contend that this court has jurisdiction because of “a challenge to the constitutionality of 79A Ga. Code 801, et seq., and 9901, et seq.”

However, upon oral argument we called to the attention of appellants’ counsel that the record in this court contains no motion, demurrer or other document making any constitutional attack upon any statute, and that upon our inquiry the record in the trial court contains none.

Subsequently, counsel for appellants sought in the trial court to perfect the record so as to include such a document, but it denied the motion. Its order stated in material part that “no demurrer/motion as described is of record or on file in the [trial court]. It further appearing that counsel did not physically tender to the court a demurrer/motion as set out.”

Thereafter, appellants filed in this court a motion to perfect the record so as to include such a document. Upon consideration the motion is denied.

It follows that we must adhere to the rule that, “This court will never pass upon the constitutionality of an Act of the General Assembly unless it clearly appears . . . that the point was directly and properly made in the court below and distinctly passed on by the trial judge.” Bentley v. Anderson-McGriff Hardware Co., 181 Ga. 813 (1) (184 SE 297); See also Savannah, Fla. & W. R. Co. v. Hardin, 110 Ga. 433, 437 (35 SE 681); West v. Frick Co., 183 Ga. 182 (2) (187 SE 868); Robinson v. McLennan, 224 Ga. 415 (162 SE2d 314); Walker v. Hall, 226 Ga. 68 (172 SE2d 411).

Since there is no basis for this court’s jurisdiction under the Constitution (Art. VI, Sec. II, Par. IV; Code Ann. § 2-3704) the cases are

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur, except Felton, J., who dissents. [762]*762Albert M. Horn, for appellants. E. W. Fleming, District Attorney, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Harold N. Hill, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, Marion 0. Gordon, Courtney Wilder Stanton, William B. Childers, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Interest of J. D.
655 S.E.2d 702 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2007)
In Re JD
655 S.E.2d 702 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2007)
Massey v. State
458 S.E.2d 818 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1995)
Gant v. Gant
327 S.E.2d 723 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1985)
Hardison v. Haslam
295 S.E.2d 830 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1982)
Alexander v. State
239 S.E.2d 18 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1977)
Thornton v. State
216 S.E.2d 330 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1975)
Hancock County v. Williams
198 S.E.2d 659 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1973)
North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.
194 S.E.2d 508 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
In Re BOULT
181 S.E.2d 821 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)
Tant v. State
182 S.E.2d 502 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)
Tant v. State
177 S.E.2d 484 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
177 S.E.2d 484, 226 Ga. 761, 1970 Ga. LEXIS 673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tant-v-state-ga-1970.