Bell v. Bell

18 S.E.2d 473, 193 Ga. 291, 1942 Ga. LEXIS 374
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 13, 1942
Docket13993.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 18 S.E.2d 473 (Bell v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bell v. Bell, 18 S.E.2d 473, 193 Ga. 291, 1942 Ga. LEXIS 374 (Ga. 1942).

Opinion

Obice, Justice.

1. The attack, made for the first time in the bill of exceptions, that the decision excepted to was void because its effect was to deprive the plaintiffs in error of vested contract and property rights, privileges, and immunities and therefore in violation of paragraph 5 of section 1 of article 12 of the constitution of this State, is not sufficient to give this court jurisdiction of the writ of error. Paragraph 5 of section 2 of article 6 of the constitution; Felker v. Still, 176 Ga. 735 (169 S. E. 15); Silas v. State, 181 Ga. 744 (184 S. E. 318); Bentley v. Anderson-McGriff Hardware Co., 181 Ga. 813 (184 S. E. 297); Forrester v . Lowe, 192 Ga. 469, 477 (15 S. E. 2d, 719).

2. The same paragraph requires that any case carried to this court which belongs to the class of which the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction shall be transferred thereto. Paragraph 9 of the same section of the constitution declares that the Court of Appeals shall have jurisdiction in all cases in which such jurisdiction has not been conferred upon the Supreme Court. The case is therefore transferred to the Court of Appeals.

3. In so transferring the case this court does not adjudicate whether or not the exception involved is such a justiciable question as is reviewable by the Court of Appeals. That court, and not this court, has jurisdiction to determine that question, together with any other issue which may properly arise under the record.

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concw. *292 O. N. Singleton, J. L. Barwick, G. V. Whiddon, and Joseph M. Love, for plaintiffs. John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, William E. Spence, E. A, Stephens, and Durwood T. Pye, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Walker
74 S.E.2d 461 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)
Aiken v. Richardson
64 S.E.2d 54 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 S.E.2d 473, 193 Ga. 291, 1942 Ga. LEXIS 374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-bell-ga-1942.