Bennett v. Fratus

177 So. 2d 334, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3008
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 21, 1965·No. No. 33629·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Respondent, Fratus, who was plaintiff in .a law action in the trial court was permitted to take a voluntary non-suit with an approving order of the trial judge. Bennett appealed to the Court of Appeal, Third District. On Motion of Fratus as appellee, the District Court dismissed the appeal on the ground that the order permitting the non-suit was non-final and therefore not subject to review by appeal. Bennett v. Fratus, Fla.App., 164 So.2d 827. It is claimed here "that the cited decision conflicts with the decision of the Court of Appeal, First District, in Dobson v. Crews, 164 So.2d 252. There is no conflict. Here there was no final judgment. In Dobson, there was a final judgment. Hence no conflict exists. Even if an interlocutory appeal had been filed, the order did not relate to venue or jurisdiction of the person. Rule 4.2(a) Fla. App. Rules., 31 F.S.A.

Since the instant decision we have disposed of the voluntary non-suit problem in Crews v. Dobson, Fla., 177 So.2d 202, opinion filed July 7, 1965.

The writ is denied.

TPIORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bennett v. Fratus, 177 So. 2d 334, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3008 (Fla. 1965).

177 So. 2d 334 (Bennett v. Fratus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bennett v. Fratus
177 So. 2d 702 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Bennett v. Fratus
177 So. 2d 335 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1965)
Florida East Coast Railroad v. Jones
183 So. 2d 683 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1965)
Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Smith
183 So. 2d 690 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1965)