Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Smith

Supreme Court of Florida

Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Smith

183 So. 2d 690, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 2719

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJuly 21, 1965

DocketNo. 33580

StatusPublished

This text of 183 So. 2d 690 (Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Smith, 183 So. 2d 690, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 2719 (Fla. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we are requested to review a decision of the Court of Appeal, Second District, because of an alleged conflict with Dobson v. Crews, 164 So.2d 252, a decision of the Court of Appeal, First District. See, Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Smith, Fla.App., 166 So.2d 233.

The District Court here dismissed the Appeal because of the non-appealability of an order permitting a voluntary non-suit. We have distinguished Dobson by our opinion in a similar case. See, Bennett v. Fratus, Fla., 177 So.2d 334, opinion filed the [691]*69121st day of July, 1965. We have generally disposed of the non-suit problem by our decision in Crews v. Dobson, Fla., 177 So.2d 202, opinion filed July 7, 1965.

We find no jurisdictional conflict between the instant decision and the decisions in the cited cases.

The writ is, therefore, denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI