Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Smith

166 So. 2d 233, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 3962
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 1, 1964·No. No. 4065·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

An appeal was brought by the defendant which involved a voluntary nonsuit. We dismissed the appeal as the order was non-appealable by the defendant.

On petition for rehearing the appellant requested that we treat the appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari, pursuant to Florida Statutes 59.45, F.S.A., and we granted a rehearing.

j. On rehearing and treating the appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari, we deny certiorari.

SMITH, C. J., and ALLEN and KAN-NER (Ret.), JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Smith, 166 So. 2d 233, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 3962 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

166 So. 2d 233 (Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Smith
183 So. 2d 690 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1965)
Thoman v. Ashley
170 So. 2d 332 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Peaslee v. Michalski
167 So. 2d 242 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Florida East Coast Railroad v. Jones
166 So. 2d 842 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)