Florida East Coast Railroad v. Jones
This text of 183 So. 2d 683 (Florida East Coast Railroad v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By petition for a writ of certiorari we are requested to review a decision of the Court of Appeal, Second District, because of an alleged conflict with Dobson v. Crews, 164 So.2d 252, a decision of the Court of [684]*684Appeal, First District. See, Florida East Coast Railroad Co. v. Jones, Fla.App., 166 So.2d 842.
The District Court here dismissed the Appeal because of the non-appealability of an order permitting a voluntary non-suit. We have distinguished Dobson by our opinion in a similar case. See, Bennett v. Fratus, Fla., 177 So.2d 334 opinion filed the 21st day of July, 1965. We have generally disposed of the non-suit problem by our decision in Crews v. Dobson, Fla., 177 So.2d 202 opinion filed July 7, 1965.
We find no jurisdictional conflict between the instant decision and the decisions in the cited cases.
The writ is, therefore denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
183 So. 2d 683, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 2718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-east-coast-railroad-v-jones-fla-1965.