Florida East Coast Railroad v. Jones

183 So. 2d 683, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 2718
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 21, 1965·No. No. 33694·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we are requested to review a decision of the Court of Appeal, Second District, because of an alleged conflict with Dobson v. Crews, 164 So.2d 252, a decision of the Court of [684] Appeal, First District. See, Florida East Coast Railroad Co. v. Jones, Fla.App., 166 So.2d 842.

The District Court here dismissed the Appeal because of the non-appealability of an order permitting a voluntary non-suit. We have distinguished Dobson by our opinion in a similar case. See, Bennett v. Fratus, Fla., 177 So.2d 334 opinion filed the 21st day of July, 1965. We have generally disposed of the non-suit problem by our decision in Crews v. Dobson, Fla., 177 So.2d 202 opinion filed July 7, 1965.

We find no jurisdictional conflict between the instant decision and the decisions in the cited cases.

The writ is, therefore denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Florida East Coast Railroad v. Jones, 183 So. 2d 683, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 2718 (Fla. 1965).

183 So. 2d 683 (Florida East Coast Railroad v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dobson v. Crews
164 So. 2d 252 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Crews v. Dobson
177 So. 2d 202 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1965)
Florida East Coast Railroad v. Jones
166 So. 2d 842 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Bennett v. Fratus
177 So. 2d 334 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1965)