Benjamin Kohn v. State Bar of California
This text of 75 F.4th 985 (Benjamin Kohn v. State Bar of California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 21 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BENJAMIN KOHN, No. 20-17316
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:20-cv-04827-PJH Northern District of California, v. Oakland
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA; ORDER CALIFORNIA COMMITTEE OF BAR EXAMINERS, and Their Agents in Their Official Capacity,
Defendants-Appellees.
MURGUIA, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that
this case be heard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)
and Circuit Rule 35-3.
Judge Koh did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
75 F.4th 985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benjamin-kohn-v-state-bar-of-california-ca9-2023.