Benjamin Kohn v. State Bar of California

75 F.4th 985
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Benjamin Kohn v. State Bar of California. Read the opinion of the Court — 87 F.4th 1021
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 21, 2023·No. 20-17316·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 21 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BENJAMIN KOHN, No. 20-17316

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:20-cv-04827-PJH Northern District of California, v. Oakland

STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA; ORDER CALIFORNIA COMMITTEE OF BAR EXAMINERS, and Their Agents in Their Official Capacity,

Defendants-Appellees.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be heard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3.

Judge Koh did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Benjamin Kohn v. State Bar of California, 75 F.4th 985 (9th Cir. 2023).

75 F.4th 985 (Benjamin Kohn v. State Bar of California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.