Benassi v. Georgia-Pacific

667 P.2d 532, 662 P.2d 760, 63 Or. App. 672, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 3162
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided June 29, 1983·No. A7910-04736; CA A21694·Published·Cited by 26 cases

Opinion

*674 BUTTLER, P. J.

In our original opinion in this case, we reversed a judgment for plaintiff and remanded the case for a new trial on plaintiffs defamation claim. The only issues raised or discussed by either party related to that claim. In his petition, plaintiff points out, correctly, that he also prevailed on a wage claim for $4,429.90, plus $4,000 attorney fees on that claim, and that our mandate should have affirmed that portion of the judgment. He is correct.

The following portions of the judgment are affirmed:

“IT IS FURTHER CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiff have and recover of and from the defendant judgment in the sum of $4,429.90, together with interest thereon at the rate of 9% per annum from May 31, 1979 until paid.
«* * * * *
“IT IS FURTHER CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiff have and recover of and from the defendant judgment in the sum of $4,000 on account of plaintiffs attorneys fees on his first claim for relief.”

Petition for reconsideration granted; former opinion modified, and, as so modified, adhered to.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Benassi v. Georgia-Pacific, 667 P.2d 532, 662 P.2d 760, 63 Or. App. 672, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 3162 (Or. Ct. App. 1983).

667 P.2d 532 (Benassi v. Georgia-Pacific) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Herrera v. C & M Victor Co.
337 P.3d 154 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2014)
Tubra v. Cooke
225 P.3d 862 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2010)
National Union Fire Insurance v. Starplex Corp.
188 P.3d 332 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)
Lewis v. Carson Oil Co.
127 P.3d 1207 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2006)
Scheinberg v. Adidas America, Inc.
120 F. App'x 684 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
Johnson v. Brown
91 P.3d 741 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2004)
Affolter v. Baugh Construction Oregon, Inc.
51 P.3d 642 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2002)
Vanderselt v. Pope
963 P.2d 130 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1998)
Bippes v. Hershey Chocolate U.S.A.
180 F.R.D. 386 (D. Oregon, 1998)
Lund v. Arbonne International, Inc.
887 P.2d 817 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1994)
Bickford v. Tektronix, Inc.
842 P.2d 432 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)
Cooper v. Portland General Electric Corp.
824 P.2d 1152 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)
Rice v. Comtek Manufacturing of Oregon, Inc.
766 F. Supp. 1550 (D. Oregon, 1990)
Greenfield v. Ollikala
736 P.2d 599 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1987)
Tosti v. Ayik
476 N.E.2d 928 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1985)
Worley v. Oregon Physicians Service
686 P.2d 404 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1984)
Bock v. Zittenfield
672 P.2d 1237 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1983)
Koch v. Laborico
674 P.2d 602 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1983)