Bell v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Bell v. State

102 S.E. 845, 25 Ga. App. 247, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 713

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 14, 1920

Docket11284

StatusPublished

This text of 102 S.E. 845 (Bell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bell v. State, 102 S.E. 845, 25 Ga. App. 247, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 713 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The evidence for the State shows an unprovoked attack with a deadly weapon upon the person assaulted. Even under the statement of the defendant a verdict of guilty was demanded. There is nothing in any of the special grounds of the motion for new trial which would demand that a verdict so clearly correct should he set aside.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke J., concur. M. C. Edwards, for plaintiff in error. B. T. Castellow, solicitor-general, R. R. Arnold, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

The evidence for the State shows an unprovoked attack with a deadly weapon upon the person assaulted. Even under the statement of the defendant a verdict of guilty was demanded. There is nothing in any of the special grounds of the motion for new trial which would demand that a verdict so clearly correct should he set aside.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke J., concur. M. C. Edwards, for plaintiff in error. B. T. Castellow, solicitor-general, R. R. Arnold, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 S.E. 845, 25 Ga. App. 247, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-state-gactapp-1920.