Bell v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Bell v. State

102 S.E. 845, 25 Ga. App. 247, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 713

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 21 Ga. App. 788 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 14, 1920·No. 11284·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The evidence for the State shows an unprovoked attack with a deadly weapon upon the person assaulted. Even under the statement of the defendant a verdict of guilty was demanded. There is nothing in any of the special grounds of the motion for new trial which would demand that a verdict so clearly correct should he set aside.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke J., concur. M. C. Edwards, for plaintiff in error. B. T. Castellow, solicitor-general, R. R. Arnold, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

The evidence for the State shows an unprovoked attack with a deadly weapon upon the person assaulted. Even under the statement of the defendant a verdict of guilty was demanded. There is nothing in any of the special grounds of the motion for new trial which would demand that a verdict so clearly correct should he set aside.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke J., concur. M. C. Edwards, for plaintiff in error. B. T. Castellow, solicitor-general, R. R. Arnold, contra.

Bell v. State, 102 S.E. 845, 25 Ga. App. 247, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 713 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

102 S.E. 845 (Bell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.