Bell v. State

107 S.E. 619, 27 Ga. App. 182, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 766
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 14, 1921
Docket12373
StatusPublished

This text of 107 S.E. 619 (Bell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bell v. State, 107 S.E. 619, 27 Ga. App. 182, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 766 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Luke, J.

This case is here upon the sole assignment of error that the evidence does not authorize the verdict. There is evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge. There being no [183]*183complaint of any error of law upon the trial of the case, it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Decided June 14, 1921. Indictment for distilling intoxicating liquor; from Jasper superior court — Judge Park. March 10, 1921. W. H. Key, for plaintiff in error. Doyle Campbell, solicitor-general, A. Y. Clement, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., coneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 S.E. 619, 27 Ga. App. 182, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-state-gactapp-1921.