Bell v. State

107 S.E. 619, 27 Ga. App. 182, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 766
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Ga. App. 533
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 14, 1921·No. 12373·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

This case is here upon the sole assignment of error that the evidence does not authorize the verdict. There is evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge. There being no [183]*183complaint of any error of law upon the trial of the case, it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Decided June 14, 1921. Indictment for distilling intoxicating liquor; from Jasper superior court — Judge Park. March 10, 1921. W. H. Key, for plaintiff in error. Doyle Campbell, solicitor-general, A. Y. Clement, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., coneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. State, 107 S.E. 619, 27 Ga. App. 182, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 766 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

107 S.E. 619 (Bell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.