Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Bell v. State

Bell v. State

116 S.E. 543, 30 Ga. App. 4, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 206
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 6, 1923·No. 13988·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

The motion for a new trial contained only the usual general grounds; and the evidence, while circumstantial, being sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt, the judgment of the court overruling the 'motion for a new trial cannot be controlled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., -concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. State, 116 S.E. 543, 30 Ga. App. 4, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 206 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

116 S.E. 543 (Bell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.