Bell v. State
116 S.E. 543, 30 Ga. App. 4, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 206
This text of 116 S.E. 543 (Bell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bell v. State, 116 S.E. 543, 30 Ga. App. 4, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 206 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).
Opinion
The motion for a new trial contained only the usual general grounds; and the evidence, while circumstantial, being sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt, the judgment of the court overruling the 'motion for a new trial cannot be controlled.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
116 S.E. 543, 30 Ga. App. 4, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-state-gactapp-1923.