Bell v. State
92 S.E. 950, 20 Ga. App. 175, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 779
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 21 Ga. App. 788 →
Opinion
The evidence was sufficient to warrant the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial based upon the general grounds only.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bell v. State, 92 S.E. 950, 20 Ga. App. 175, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 779 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).
92 S.E. 950 (Bell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.