Bell v. State
86 S.E. 533, 17 Ga. App. 285, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 345
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 21 Ga. App. 788 →
Opinion
1. Ineligibility of a juror because of service in the same court during its next preceding term renders him incompetent propter defectum and is a good ground for challenge, but is not cause for a new trial, even though the fact of his ineligibility was not known to the defendant until after the verdict was rendered. Jordan v. State, 119 Ga. 443 (6), 445 (46 S. E. 679); Hill v. State, 122 Ga. 166 (50 S. E. 57).
2. The evidence authorized the verdict. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bell v. State, 86 S.E. 533, 17 Ga. App. 285, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 345 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).
86 S.E. 533 (Bell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jordan v. State
46 S.E. 679 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Hill v. State
50 S.E. 57 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)