Batalona v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Batalona v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 142 Haw. 84
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided October 13, 2017·No. SCWC-16-0000428·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-16-0000428 13-OCT-2017 08:12 AM

SCWC-16-0000428

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

ALBERT BATALONA, Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-16-0000428; S.P.P. NO. 10-1-0075; CR. NO. 03-1-0787)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant Albert Batalona’s application for writ of certiorari, filed on September 5, 2017, is hereby hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, October 13, 2017. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Batalona v. State, (haw 2017).

Batalona v. State (Batalona v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.