Batalona v. State
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-16-0000428 11-AUG-2017 08:25 AM
SCWC-16-0000428
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII
ALBERT BATALONA, Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (S.P.P. NO. 10-1-0075; CR. NO. 03-1-0787)
ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the above-
referenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate
Court of Appeals at the time the application for a writ of
certiorari was filed, see Hawaii Revised Statutes § 602-59(a)
(2016); see also Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule
36(b)(1) (2016),
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s application for
a writ of certiorari, filed July 31, 2017, is dismissed without
prejudice to re-filing the application pursuant to HRAP Rule
40.1(a) (2015) (“The application shall be filed within 30 days after the filing of the intermediate court of appeals’ judgment
on appeal or dismissal order, unless the time for filing the
application is extended in accordance with this Rule.”).
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, August 11, 2017.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Batalona v. State (Batalona v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.