Batalona v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Batalona v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 142 Haw. 84
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided February 2, 2017·No. SCWC-15-0000569·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-15-0000569 02-FEB-2017 09:08 AM

SCWC-15-0000569

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

ALBERT BATALONA,

Petitioner-Respondent/Petitioner-Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF HAWAI#I,

Respondent-Petitioner/Respondent-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-15-0000569; S.P.P. NO. 10-1-0096; CR. NO. 99-1549)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner-Respondent/Petitioner-Appellant Albert Batalona’s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on December 19, 2016, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, February 2, 2017.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Batalona v. State, (haw 2017).

Batalona v. State (Batalona v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.