Barnett v. Patillo
36 So. 2d 451, 251 Ala. 1
Opinion
This petition for certiorari is due to be stricken for failure of observance of Supreme Court Rule 36, Code 1940, Tit. 7 Appendix. Ex parte Wood, 215 Ala. 280, 110 So. 409; Haney v. State, 250 Ala. 664, 36 So.2d 117; Ex parte Anderson, post, p. 32, 36 So.2d 244. It is so ordered.
Petition for writ of certiorari stricken.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barnett v. Patillo, 36 So. 2d 451, 251 Ala. 1 (Ala. 1948).
36 So. 2d 451 (Barnett v. Patillo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Durham v. State
250 So. 2d 696 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1971)
Hochman v. State
91 So. 2d 502 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1956)
Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Korneghy
71 So. 2d 301 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1954)
Duckett v. State
60 So. 2d 357 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1952)
Stovall v. State
57 So. 2d 641 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1952)
Bates v. General Steel Tank Co.
55 So. 2d 218 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1951)