Barnett v. Patillo

36 So. 2d 451, 251 Ala. 1
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 17, 1948
Docket6 Div. 758.
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 36 So. 2d 451 (Barnett v. Patillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barnett v. Patillo, 36 So. 2d 451, 251 Ala. 1 (Ala. 1948).

Opinion

STAKELY, Justice.

This petition for certiorari is due to be stricken for failure of observance of Supreme Court Rule 36, Code 1940, Tit. 7 Appendix. Ex parte Wood, 215 Ala. 280, 110 So. 409; Haney v. State, 250 Ala. 664, 36 So.2d 117; Ex parte Anderson, post, p. 32, 36 So.2d 244. It is so ordered.

Petition for writ of certiorari stricken.

GARDNER, C. J., and FOSTER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Durham v. State
250 So. 2d 696 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1971)
Hochman v. State
91 So. 2d 502 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1956)
Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Korneghy
71 So. 2d 301 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1954)
Duckett v. State
60 So. 2d 357 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1952)
Stovall v. State
57 So. 2d 641 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1952)
Bates v. General Steel Tank Co.
55 So. 2d 218 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 So. 2d 451, 251 Ala. 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnett-v-patillo-ala-1948.