Haney v. State
36 So. 2d 117, 250 Ala. 664
Opinion
Petition of John Vernon Haney for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in the case of Haney v. State, 36 So.2d 116.
The certiorari is stricken for failure to comply with Rules of Practice in Supreme Court, rule 36, Code 1940, Tit. 7, Appendix, p. 1017. Allen v. State, 249 Ala. 201, 30 So.2d 483; Peterson v. State, 248 Ala. 179, 27 So.2d 30.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Haney v. State, 36 So. 2d 117, 250 Ala. 664 (Ala. 1948).
36 So. 2d 117 (Haney v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hochman v. State
91 So. 2d 502 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1956)
Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Korneghy
71 So. 2d 301 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1954)
Duckett v. State
60 So. 2d 357 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1952)
Stovall v. State
57 So. 2d 641 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1952)
Bates v. General Steel Tank Co.
55 So. 2d 218 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1951)
Barnett v. Patillo
36 So. 2d 451 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1948)
Nix v. State
36 So. 2d 456 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1948)
Anderson v. State
36 So. 2d 244 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1948)