Stovall v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Stovall v. State

57 So. 2d 641, 257 Ala. 116, 1952 Ala. LEXIS 152

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedMarch 13, 1952

Docket7 Div. 158

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 57 So. 2d 641 (Stovall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stovall v. State, 57 So. 2d 641, 257 Ala. 116, 1952 Ala. LEXIS 152 (Ala. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

LAWSON, Justice.

This is a petition by Jack Stovall for certiorari to the 'Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in the case of Stovall v. State, 57 So.2d 641.

The petition is dismissed for failure to comply with the rule of this court requiring such petition tO' be presented on transcript paper. Supreme Court Rule 36, Code 1940, Title 7, Appendix; Bates v. General Steel Tank Co., Ala.Sup, 55 So.2d 218; Maddox v. City of Birmingham, 255 Ala. 440, 52 So.2d 166; Nix v. State, 251 Ala. 1, 36 So.2d 456; Barnett v. Pattillo, 251 Ala. 1, 36 So.2d 451; Anderson v. State, 251 Ala. 32, 36 So.2d 244; Farley v. State, 251 Ala. 391, 37 So.2d 440; Johns v. Thomas H. Vaughn & Co., 251 Ala. 489, 38 So.2d 21; Haney v. State, 250 Ala. 664, 36 So.2d 117; Allen v. State, 249 Ala. 201, 30 So.2d 483; Peterson v. State, 248 Ala. 179, 27 So.2d 30. See Ex parte Wood, 215 Ala. 280, 110 So. 409.

Petition dismissed.

FOSTER, SIMPSON, and STAKELY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LAWSON, Justice.

This is a petition by Jack Stovall for certiorari to the 'Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in the case of Stovall v. State, 57 So.2d 641.

The petition is dismissed for failure to comply with the rule of this court requiring such petition tO' be presented on transcript paper. Supreme Court Rule 36, Code 1940, Title 7, Appendix; Bates v. General Steel Tank Co., Ala.Sup, 55 So.2d 218; Maddox v. City of Birmingham, 255 Ala. 440, 52 So.2d 166; Nix v. State, 251 Ala. 1, 36 So.2d 456; Barnett v. Pattillo, 251 Ala. 1, 36 So.2d 451; Anderson v. State, 251 Ala. 32, 36 So.2d 244; Farley v. State, 251 Ala. 391, 37 So.2d 440; Johns v. Thomas H. Vaughn & Co., 251 Ala. 489, 38 So.2d 21; Haney v. State, 250 Ala. 664, 36 So.2d 117; Allen v. State, 249 Ala. 201, 30 So.2d 483; Peterson v. State, 248 Ala. 179, 27 So.2d 30. See Ex parte Wood, 215 Ala. 280, 110 So. 409.

Petition dismissed.

FOSTER, SIMPSON, and STAKELY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 So. 2d 641, 257 Ala. 116, 1952 Ala. LEXIS 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stovall-v-state-ala-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack