Durham v. State

250 So. 2d 696, 287 Ala. 731, 1971 Ala. LEXIS 812
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMay 6, 1971
Docket1 Div. 616
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 250 So. 2d 696 (Durham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Durham v. State, 250 So. 2d 696, 287 Ala. 731, 1971 Ala. LEXIS 812 (Ala. 1971).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We ordered the issuance of á Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals after granting Durham’s Application for Rehearing.

After further deliberation, we have concluded that the Application for Rehearing should not have been granted and that we should not have ordered the issuance of the Writ of Certiorari. Those orders are vacated.

The judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals stands affirmed.

All of the Justices concur except HEFLIN, C. J., who dissénts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bowden v. State
538 So. 2d 1226 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1988)
Humphrey v. State
304 So. 2d 617 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1974)
Kilpatrick v. State
285 So. 2d 516 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
250 So. 2d 696, 287 Ala. 731, 1971 Ala. LEXIS 812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durham-v-state-ala-1971.