Durham v. State
250 So. 2d 696, 287 Ala. 731, 1971 Ala. LEXIS 812
Opinions
We ordered the issuance of á Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals after granting Durham’s Application for Rehearing.
After further deliberation, we have concluded that the Application for Rehearing should not have been granted and that we should not have ordered the issuance of the Writ of Certiorari. Those orders are vacated.
The judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals stands affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Durham v. State, 250 So. 2d 696, 287 Ala. 731, 1971 Ala. LEXIS 812 (Ala. 1971).
250 So. 2d 696 (Durham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bowden v. State
538 So. 2d 1226 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1988)
Humphrey v. State
304 So. 2d 617 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1974)
Kilpatrick v. State
285 So. 2d 516 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1973)