Barbara J. Reid v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.

575 F.2d 1175, 23 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1197, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 11318
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMay 5, 1978
Docket76-2451
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 575 F.2d 1175 (Barbara J. Reid v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barbara J. Reid v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., 575 F.2d 1175, 23 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1197, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 11318 (6th Cir. 1978).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is the second appeal in a personal injury action based on a products liability claim. Initially, the district court dismissed the complaint by applying a three-year statute of limitations. This court reversed and remanded the decision of the district court in Reid v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., 512 F.2d 1294 (6th Cir. 1975), holding that, under Michigan law, a products liability personal injury action is governed by the four-year statute of limitations of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), not the general personal injury limitation of three years. After remand, but prior to trial, the Supreme Court of Michigan stated in strongly worded dicta that the three-year statute of limitations should apply in personal injury actions brought by consumers against manufacturers. See Parish v. B. F. Goodrich Co., 395 Mich. 271, 235 N.W.2d 570 (1975). On the basis of the Parish decision, the district court again dismissed the complaint. Thereafter, in Southgate Schools v. West Side Construction Co., 399 Mich. 72, 247 N.W.2d 884 (1976), the Supreme Court of Michigan held that the three-year statute of limitations would apply in actions similar to the present case.

On appeal, plaintiff argues that the previous decision of this court constitutes the law of the case and that the subsequent rulings by the Supreme Court of Michigan should not apply to the present case. We disagree. In diversity cases, federal courts are bound by the law as declared by the highest state court. Erie R. R. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188 (1938). In its opinion in South-gate Schools, the Supreme Court of Michigan removed all doubt that may have existed previously as to the controlling rule of law in that State.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Woodard v. ERP Operating Ltd. Partnership
351 F. Supp. 2d 708 (E.D. Michigan, 2005)
Cudney v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
21 F. App'x 424 (Sixth Circuit, 2001)
Cudney v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
84 F. Supp. 2d 856 (E.D. Michigan, 2000)
Allstate Indemnity Co. v. Fifer
47 F. Supp. 2d 913 (W.D. Tennessee, 1998)
Jones v. United Metal Recyclers
825 F. Supp. 1288 (W.D. Michigan, 1993)
Scott v. Bank One Trust Co.
577 N.E.2d 1077 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1991)
Richardson v. United States
841 F.2d 993 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
Donnelly v. Boufsko, Inc. (In Re Boufsko, Inc.)
44 B.R. 98 (E.D. Michigan, 1984)
Reimer v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp.
576 F. Supp. 197 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1983)
Witherspoon v. General Motors Corp.
535 F. Supp. 432 (W.D. Missouri, 1982)
Garcia v. Texas Instruments, Inc.
610 S.W.2d 456 (Texas Supreme Court, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
575 F.2d 1175, 23 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1197, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 11318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barbara-j-reid-v-volkswagen-of-america-inc-ca6-1978.