Banks v. Watson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Banks v. Watson

1914 OK 103, 139 P. 306, 40 Okla. 450, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 51

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 3, 1914

Docket5719

StatusPublished

Cited by13 cases

This text of 1914 OK 103 (Banks v. Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Banks v. Watson, 1914 OK 103, 139 P. 306, 40 Okla. 450, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 51 (Okla. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

TURNER, J.

The judgment from which this appeal is prosecuted was rendered on April 28, 1913. On the same day motion for a new trial was filed, and on May 15, 1913, was-overruled. The case-made bears no endorsement purporting to show that it was filed in the office of the clerk of the trial court, and for that reason it is a nullity. Rev. Laws 1910, sec. 5242; St. Louis, I. M. & S. R. Co. v. Burrow, 33 Okla. 701, 127 Pac. 478. The statutory period of six months, within which to perfect an appeal to this court, having expired, no time remains within which plaintiffs in error can withdraw the case-made and perfect the same by filing it with the clerk of the trial court; and, upon the authority of Brooks et al. v. United Mine Workers of America et al., 36 Okla. 109, 128 Pac. 236, and Ft. Smith & W. R. Co. v. McKee, 38 Okla. 194, 132 Pac. 497, the case-made cannot be considered on appeal. Certifying the same also as a transcript avails nothing, for the reason that no error is assigned apparent on the face of the record. The motion to dismiss is sustained. ■

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TURNER, J.

The judgment from which this appeal is prosecuted was rendered on April 28, 1913. On the same day motion for a new trial was filed, and on May 15, 1913, was-overruled. The case-made bears no endorsement purporting to show that it was filed in the office of the clerk of the trial court, and for that reason it is a nullity. Rev. Laws 1910, sec. 5242; St. Louis, I. M. & S. R. Co. v. Burrow, 33 Okla. 701, 127 Pac. 478. The statutory period of six months, within which to perfect an appeal to this court, having expired, no time remains within which plaintiffs in error can withdraw the case-made and perfect the same by filing it with the clerk of the trial court; and, upon the authority of Brooks et al. v. United Mine Workers of America et al., 36 Okla. 109, 128 Pac. 236, and Ft. Smith & W. R. Co. v. McKee, 38 Okla. 194, 132 Pac. 497, the case-made cannot be considered on appeal. Certifying the same also as a transcript avails nothing, for the reason that no error is assigned apparent on the face of the record. The motion to dismiss is sustained. ■

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1914 OK 103, 139 P. 306, 40 Okla. 450, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 51, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banks-v-watson-okla-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack