Palmer v. Murray
This text of 1923 OK 241 (Palmer v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Came on to be heard in the above-entitled and numbered cause defendants in error’s motion to dismiss the appeal herein, upon the grounds that the pe-' tition in error does not have attached to it any case-made or certified transcript of the record that was filed in the office of the court clerk of the district court of Atoka county where said cause was originally tried.
The record discloses that the above cause was tried and judgment rendered on the 7th day of January, 1921, in said district court of Atoka county, and that more than six months have expired since rendition of the judgment therein, and that no petition in error with copy of case-made or duly certified copy of the transcript, as required by law, has been filed in this court.
Record discloses that the purported case-made was never filed- in the trial court. It, therefore, follows that the motion to dismiss is well taken, and the same must be sustained. Butler v. Chateau et al., 83 Okla. 259, 201 Pac. 660; Bank v. Watson, 40 Okla. 450, 139 Pac. 306; Gibbs v. Tanner, 43 Okla. 477, 143 Pac. 189; Wagnon v. Davidson, 79 Okla. 209, 192 Pac. 565.
It is ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1923 OK 241, 215 P. 195, 89 Okla. 232, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 1054, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmer-v-murray-okla-1923.