Kemp v. Mayer

1923 OK 1158, 221 P. 429, 96 Okla. 238, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 275
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedDecember 18, 1923
Docket14582
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 1923 OK 1158 (Kemp v. Mayer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kemp v. Mayer, 1923 OK 1158, 221 P. 429, 96 Okla. 238, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 275 (Okla. 1923).

Opinion

COCHRAN, J.

Final judgment was rendered in this case on February 7, 1923, from which plaintiff in error appealed to this court by petition in error and case-made. Defendant in error files his motion to dismiss upon the ground that, the pretended case-made does not show it has been filed in the office of the clerk of the trial court and that, the statutory period allowed by law having expired in which to bring appeals since the rendition of the judgment or final order appealed from, the case-made cannot be withdrawn for correction. The case-made does not show that it has been filed in the office of the clerk of the trial court, and the statutory six months in which to appeal has expired. In Banks v. Watson, 40 Olda. 450, 139 Pac. 306, the court said:

“A ease-made filed in this court which does not show that it has been filed in the office of the clerk of the trial court is a nullity, and where such a case-made remains in this court after the expiration of the statutory time in which to perfect an appeal, on motion the appeal will be dismissed.”

The case-made is certified to by the clerk as a transcript, but no errors are assigned which are determinable upon transcript.

No response has been filed.

It is our opinion that the appeal should be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

JOHNSON, C. J., and McNEILL, NICHOLSON, and MASON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jack v. State
1937 OK 394 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1937)
Peterson v. Sorensen
65 P.2d 12 (Utah Supreme Court, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1923 OK 1158, 221 P. 429, 96 Okla. 238, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kemp-v-mayer-okla-1923.