Atkinson v. Burkett

1952 OK 457, 251 P.2d 810, 207 Okla. 586, 1952 Okla. LEXIS 867
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided December 23, 1952·No. No. 35584·Published

Opinion

BINGAMAN, J.

The defendants in error move to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the case-made attached to and made a part of the petition in error does not show that it was filed in the office of the clerk of the trial court as required by 12 O.S. 1951 §958. The case-made does not show that it has been filed in the office of the clerk of the trial court and the statutory time in which to perfect an appeal has expired. Following an unbroken line of decisions by this court, the motion must be sustained. Banks v. Watson, 40 Okla. 450, 139 P. 306; Dailey v. Citizens National Bank of Pawhuska, 89 Okla. 94, 214 P. 116; In re Sexton’s Estate, 90 Okla. 37, 215 P. 773; Miller v. Berryman, 169 Okla. 524, 37 P. 2d 975; Harner v. Beese, 175 Okla. 641, 54 P. 2d 321.

Appeal dismissed.

HALLEY, V.C.J., and WELCH, CORN, GIBSON, DAVISON, JOHNSON, and O’NEAL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson v. Burkett, 1952 OK 457, 251 P.2d 810, 207 Okla. 586, 1952 Okla. LEXIS 867 (Okla. 1952).

1952 OK 457 (Atkinson v. Burkett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Banks v. Watson
1914 OK 103 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)
Miller v. Berryman
1934 OK 683 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1934)
Dailey v. Citizens' Nat. Bank of Pawhuska
1923 OK 175 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
In Re Sexton's Estate
1923 OK 314 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Harner v. Beese
1936 OK 115 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1936)