Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Boston & Maine Railroad

373 U.S. 372, 83 S. Ct. 1312, 10 L. Ed. 2d 419, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1554
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 17, 1963·No. 97·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

373 U.S. 372

83 S.Ct. 1312

10 L.Ed.2d 419

BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD CO. et al.
v.
BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD et al. MARYLAND PORT AUTHORITY et al. v. BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD et al. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD et al.

Nos. 97, 98, and 99.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 1963

Rehearing Denied June 17, 1963.

See 374 U.S. 859, 83 S.Ct. 1862.

Robert W. Ginnane, Washington, D. C., Jervis Langdon, Jr., and William L. Marbury, Baltimore, Md., for appellants.

J. William Doolittle, Washington, D. C., Thomas E. Dewey, New York City, and Robert G. Bleakney, Jr., Sudbury, Mass., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Mr. Justice WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 373 U.S. 372, 83 S. Ct. 1312, 10 L. Ed. 2d 419, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1554 (1963).

373 U.S. 372 (Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Boston & Maine Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New Ikor, Inc. v. McGlennon
446 F. Supp. 136 (D. Massachusetts, 1978)