Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Boston & Maine Railroad

372 U.S. 902, 83 S. Ct. 715
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Boston & Maine Railroad. Read the opinion of the Court — 373 U.S. 372
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 18, 1963·No. No. 97; No. 98; No. 99·Published

Opinion

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 370 U. S. 914.) The motion of John H. Colgren for leave to withdraw his appearance as counsel for appellees is granted. The motion for enlargement of time for oral argument is granted and 45 additional minutes are allotted to each side. Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 372 U.S. 902, 83 S. Ct. 715 (1963).

372 U.S. 902 (Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Boston & Maine Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.