Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court

Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Boston & Maine Railroad

372 U.S. 902, 83 S. Ct. 715

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedFebruary 18, 1963

DocketNo. 97; No. 98; No. 99

StatusPublished

This text of 372 U.S. 902 (Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Boston & Maine Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 372 U.S. 902, 83 S. Ct. 715 (1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 370 U. S. 914.) The motion of John H. Colgren for leave to withdraw his appearance as counsel for appellees is granted. The motion for enlargement of time for oral argument is granted and 45 additional minutes are allotted to each side. Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 370 U. S. 914.) The motion of John H. Colgren for leave to withdraw his appearance as counsel for appellees is granted. The motion for enlargement of time for oral argument is granted and 45 additional minutes are allotted to each side. Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

372 U.S. 902, 83 S. Ct. 715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baltimore-ohio-railroad-v-boston-maine-railroad-scotus-1963.