Gober v. Birmingham

373 U.S. 374, 83 S. Ct. 1311, 10 L. Ed. 2d 419, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1555
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 20, 1963·No. 66·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

373 U.S. 374 (1963)

GOBER ET AL.
v.
CITY OF BIRMINGHAM.

No. 66.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued November 6-7, 1962.
Decided May 20, 1963.
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF ALABAMA.

Constance Baker Motley argued the cause for petitioners. With her on the brief were Jack Greenberg, Arthur D. Shores, Peter A. Hall, Orzell Billingsley, Jr., Oscar W. Adams, Jr., Leroy Clark, William T. Coleman, Jr., William R. Ming, Jr., James M. Nabrit III and Louis H. Pollak.

Watts E. Davis and J. M. Breckenridge argued the cause for respondent. With Mr. Davis on the brief was Earl McBee.

Solicitor General Cox, by special leave of Court, argued the cause for the United States, as amicus curiae, urging reversal. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Ralph S. Spritzer, Louis F. Claiborne, Harold H. Greene, Howard A. Glickstein and Richard K. Berg.

PER CURIAM.

The judgments are reversed. Peterson v. City of Greenville, ante, p. 244.

[For opinion of MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, see ante, p. 248.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gober v. Birmingham, 373 U.S. 374, 83 S. Ct. 1311, 10 L. Ed. 2d 419, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1555 (1963).

373 U.S. 374 (Gober v. Birmingham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Standefer v. United States
447 U.S. 10 (Supreme Court, 1980)
Hernandez v. Erlenbusch
368 F. Supp. 752 (D. Oregon, 1973)
Carmichael v. Allen
267 F. Supp. 985 (N.D. Georgia, 1967)
Clemons v. City of Birmingham
171 So. 2d 456 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1965)
Thomas v. City of Birmingham
171 So. 2d 84 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1964)