Gober v. Birmingham
This text of 373 U.S. 374 (Gober v. Birmingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
GOBER ET AL.
v.
CITY OF BIRMINGHAM.
Supreme Court of United States.
Constance Baker Motley argued the cause for petitioners. With her on the brief were Jack Greenberg, Arthur D. Shores, Peter A. Hall, Orzell Billingsley, Jr., Oscar W. Adams, Jr., Leroy Clark, William T. Coleman, Jr., William R. Ming, Jr., James M. Nabrit III and Louis H. Pollak.
Watts E. Davis and J. M. Breckenridge argued the cause for respondent. With Mr. Davis on the brief was Earl McBee.
Solicitor General Cox, by special leave of Court, argued the cause for the United States, as amicus curiae, urging reversal. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Ralph S. Spritzer, Louis F. Claiborne, Harold H. Greene, Howard A. Glickstein and Richard K. Berg.
PER CURIAM.
The judgments are reversed. Peterson v. City of Greenville, ante, p. 244.
[For opinion of MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, see ante, p. 248.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
373 U.S. 374, 83 S. Ct. 1311, 10 L. Ed. 2d 419, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gober-v-birmingham-scotus-1963.