Bailey v. State
627 So. 2d 57, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11651, 1993 WL 477684
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 17, 1993·No. No. 92-01614·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the appellant’s judgment and sentence in all respects, with the exception of a clerical error in the judgment. On remand, the trial court shall correct the judgment to reflect the jury verdict and the trial court’s oral pronouncement that the conviction on count II was for misdemeanor petit theft rather than grand theft.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bailey v. State, 627 So. 2d 57, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11651, 1993 WL 477684 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
627 So. 2d 57 (Bailey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Roesch v. State
627 So. 2d 57 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)