Bailey v. State
572 So. 2d 1032, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 239, 1991 WL 3174
This text of 572 So. 2d 1032 (Bailey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bailey v. State, 572 So. 2d 1032, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 239, 1991 WL 3174 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
Opinion
Kenneth Bailey appeals the denial of his motion to suppress. Because this case is factually indistinguishable from Arizona v. Hicks, 480 U.S. 321, 107 S.Ct. 1149, 94 L.Ed.2d 347 (1987), we are bound by its holding.
Reversed and remanded with instructions to grant Bailey’s motion to suppress.
Judgment and sentence VACATED; REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Arizona v. Hicks
480 U.S. 321 (Supreme Court, 1987)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
572 So. 2d 1032, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 239, 1991 WL 3174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.