Bailey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bailey v. State

572 So. 2d 1032, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 239, 1991 WL 3174

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bailey v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 559 So. 2d 742 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 17, 1991·No. No. 90-493·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Bailey appeals the denial of his motion to suppress. Because this case is factually indistinguishable from Arizona v. Hicks, 480 U.S. 321, 107 S.Ct. 1149, 94 L.Ed.2d 347 (1987), we are bound by its holding.

Reversed and remanded with instructions to grant Bailey’s motion to suppress.

Judgment and sentence VACATED; REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.

COWART, GOSHORN and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Bailey appeals the denial of his motion to suppress. Because this case is factually indistinguishable from Arizona v. Hicks, 480 U.S. 321, 107 S.Ct. 1149, 94 L.Ed.2d 347 (1987), we are bound by its holding.

Reversed and remanded with instructions to grant Bailey’s motion to suppress.

Judgment and sentence VACATED; REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.

COWART, GOSHORN and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Bailey v. State, 572 So. 2d 1032, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 239, 1991 WL 3174 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

572 So. 2d 1032 (Bailey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related