Bailey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bailey v. State

621 So. 2d 680, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3055, 1993 WL 66269

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 10, 1993·No. No. 92-02672·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s judgments and sentences. As in State v. Tripp, 591 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question of great public importance:

IF A TRIAL COURT IMPOSES A TERM OF PROBATION ON ONE OFFENSE CONSECUTIVE TO A SENTENCE OF INCARCERATION ON ANOTHER OFFENSE, CAN JAIL CREDIT FROM THE FIRST OFFENSE BE DENIED ON A SENTENCE IMPOSED AFTER A REVOCATION OF PROBATION ON THE SECOND OFFENSE?

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s judgments and sentences. As in State v. Tripp, 591 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question of great public importance:

IF A TRIAL COURT IMPOSES A TERM OF PROBATION ON ONE OFFENSE CONSECUTIVE TO A SENTENCE OF INCARCERATION ON ANOTHER OFFENSE, CAN JAIL CREDIT FROM THE FIRST OFFENSE BE DENIED ON A SENTENCE IMPOSED AFTER A REVOCATION OF PROBATION ON THE SECOND OFFENSE?

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Bailey v. State, 621 So. 2d 680, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3055, 1993 WL 66269 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

621 So. 2d 680 (Bailey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related