Bailey v. State

640 So. 2d 1173, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7212, 1994 WL 380930
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 20, 1994·No. No. 94-02039·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court denied as time-barred the appellant’s motion for postconviction relief, which he filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We reverse because the motion was filed within two years of the issuance of this court’s mandate in the appellant’s direct appeal from his judgment and sentence in this case. See McCuiston v. State, 507 So.2d 1185 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987) (judgment of conviction becomes final upon issuance of mandate in direct appeal), approved in, 534 So.2d 1144 (Fla.1988).

Reversed and remanded.

RYDER, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bailey v. State, 640 So. 2d 1173, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7212, 1994 WL 380930 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

640 So. 2d 1173 (Bailey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rosado v. State
654 So. 2d 623 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)