Bacon v. Withrow

10 N.E. 624, 110 Ind. 94, 1887 Ind. LEXIS 13
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 8, 1887
DocketNo. 12,774
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 10 N.E. 624 (Bacon v. Withrow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bacon v. Withrow, 10 N.E. 624, 110 Ind. 94, 1887 Ind. LEXIS 13 (Ind. 1887).

Opinion

Elliott, C. J.

The final judgment in this case was rendered on the 10th day of July, 1885, and the record was filed, in this court on the 21st day of December of that year, but no assignment of en-ors was filed until the 7th day of December, 1886. The appellees press a motion to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that the appeal was not brought within one year from the time the final judgment in the trial court, was entered.

The motion of the appellees must prevail. The assignment of errors is the appellant’s complaint, and without it there is no case before the court. Hollingsworth v. State, ex rel., 8 Ind. 257; Henderson v. Halliday, 10 Ind. 24.

, In the last case it was said : “ There is no assignment of" errors. Hence, we have no jurisdiction of the case.” Judge Buskirk thus states the rule : “Until such assignment is made, a case is not in the Supreme Court for any purpose whatever.”" Buskirk Pr. 111.

In view 'of the decision in Price v. Baker, 41 Ind. 570,. this statement, perhaps, requires modification, for, under the rule there declared, a case may be in this court for the purpose of obtaining process before the assignment of errors is filed. But when a year is allowed to elapse without filing an assignment of errors, it is quite clear that the case can not be regarded as properly in this court. Breeding v. Shinn, 11 [95]*95Ind. 547; State, ex rel., v. Delano, 34 Ind. 52; Thoma v. State, 86 Ind. 182; Estate of Thomas v. Service, 90 Ind. 128.

Filed March 8, 1887.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Wiles, in Re Gibbs
195 N.E. 572 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1935)
Makeever v. Makeever
117 N.E. 691 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1917)
Steel v. Yoder
108 N.E. 783 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1915)
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Johnson
93 N.E. 683 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1911)
Chicago Terminal Transfer Railroad v. Walton
74 N.E. 988 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1905)
Whisler v. Whisler
67 N.E. 984 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1903)
Rubey v. Hough
67 N.E. 257 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1903)
Fitch v. Long
64 N.E. 622 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1902)
Reading v. Brown
49 N.E. 41 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1898)
Board of Commissioners v. Vurpillat
42 N.E. 962 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1896)
Brown v. Trexler
30 N.E. 418 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1892)
Holloran v. Midland Railway Co.
28 N.E. 549 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1891)
Hawkins v. McDougal
25 N.E. 708 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1890)
Snyder v. State ex rel. Fleming
24 N.E. 891 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1890)
Lawrence v. Wood
24 N.E. 159 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1890)
Smythe v. Boswell
20 N.E. 263 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1889)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 N.E. 624, 110 Ind. 94, 1887 Ind. LEXIS 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bacon-v-withrow-ind-1887.