Board of Commissioners v. Vurpillat

Indiana Court of Appeals

Board of Commissioners v. Vurpillat

42 N.E. 962, 14 Ind. App. 311, 1896 Ind. App. LEXIS 251

Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided February 11, 1896·No. No. 1,916·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Lotz, J.

The judgment from which this appeal is prosecuted was rendered in the court below, on the 6th day of October, 1894. The transcript of said cause was filed in this court on October 5, 1895. The assignment of errors was not filed until December 11, 1895.

The appellee moves to dismiss the appeal, because the assignment of errors was not filed within the year. As no sufficient excuse for failing to file the assignment of errors within the year is shown, the motion to dismiss must prevail. Lawrence v. Wood, Admr., 122 Ind. 452; Bacon, Admr., v. Withrow, 110 Ind. 94.

The appeal is dismissed.

Ross, J., did not participate in this decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lotz, J.

The judgment from which this appeal is prosecuted was rendered in the court below, on the 6th day of October, 1894. The transcript of said cause was filed in this court on October 5, 1895. The assignment of errors was not filed until December 11, 1895.

The appellee moves to dismiss the appeal, because the assignment of errors was not filed within the year. As no sufficient excuse for failing to file the assignment of errors within the year is shown, the motion to dismiss must prevail. Lawrence v. Wood, Admr., 122 Ind. 452; Bacon, Admr., v. Withrow, 110 Ind. 94.

The appeal is dismissed.

Ross, J., did not participate in this decision.

Board of Commissioners v. Vurpillat, 42 N.E. 962, 14 Ind. App. 311, 1896 Ind. App. LEXIS 251 (Ind. Ct. App. 1896).

Pincite

42 N.E. 962 (Board of Commissioners v. Vurpillat) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related