Hawkins v. McDougal

25 N.E. 708, 126 Ind. 544, 1890 Ind. LEXIS 594
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 11, 1890
DocketNo 14,871
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 25 N.E. 708 (Hawkins v. McDougal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hawkins v. McDougal, 25 N.E. 708, 126 Ind. 544, 1890 Ind. LEXIS 594 (Ind. 1890).

Opinion

Elliott, J.

— There is no assignment of errors, and hence this court has no jurisdiction of this cause. The assignment of errors constitutes the complaint of the appellant in .all eases appealed from the trial courts, and in the absence of an assignment it is the duty of this court to dismiss the appeal. Estate of Thomas v. Service, 90 Ind. 128; Bacon v. Withrow, 110 Ind. 94; Smythe v. Boswell, 117 Ind. 365, and cales cited p. 366; Lawrence v. Wood, 122 Ind. 452.

Appeal dismissed, at costs of the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fitch v. Long
64 N.E. 622 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1902)
Bank of Westfield v. Inman
32 N.E. 885 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1892)
Holloran v. Midland Railway Co.
28 N.E. 549 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 N.E. 708, 126 Ind. 544, 1890 Ind. LEXIS 594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawkins-v-mcdougal-ind-1890.