Snyder v. State ex rel. Fleming

24 N.E. 891, 124 Ind. 335, 1890 Ind. LEXIS 324
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJune 18, 1890
DocketNo. 15,197
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 24 N.E. 891 (Snyder v. State ex rel. Fleming) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Snyder v. State ex rel. Fleming, 24 N.E. 891, 124 Ind. 335, 1890 Ind. LEXIS 324 (Ind. 1890).

Opinion

Mitchell, J.

William S. Fleming, as relator, instituted a proceeding in the Jay Circuit Court against the mayor and common council of the city of Portland, to compel that body by mandate to accept the proposal of,, and award the contract for, a certain street improvement to Judson A. Jaqua, who, it is alleged, submitted the lowest and best bid for the work in pursuance of notice duly given. The court overruled a demurrer to the complaint, and the defendants refusing to plead, judgment was given accordingly. From' this judgment an appeal was taken, which appellee moves to dismiss.

The sixth rule of this court requires that “ the assignment of errors shall contain the full names of the parties.” In the assignment of errors the parties are thus designated: “State of Indiana, on relation of William S. Fleming, Appellee, vs. Frank H. Snyder, Mayor, et al.”

This is in total disregard of the rule above referred to, and of the many decisions made in the enforcement of it. The assignment of errors is the appellant’s complaint, and the only parties before this court, or over whom it acquires jurisdiction, are those whose names appear therein. Thoma v. [336]*336State, 86 Ind. 182, and cases cited ; Bacon v. Withrow, 110 Ind. 94; Calvert v. State, 91 Ind. 473.

Filed June 18, 1890.

The motion to dismiss must be sustained. Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Keiser v. Howard
155 N.E. 707 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1927)
Jenkins v. Steele
102 N.E. 139 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1913)
Collins v. State
101 N.E. 1022 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1913)
Nordyke & Marmon Co. v. Fitzpatrick
71 N.E. 46 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1904)
Whisler v. Whisler
67 N.E. 984 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1903)
Gunn v. Haworth
64 N.E. 911 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1902)
Smith v. Holtz
60 N.E. 728 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1901)
City of South Bend v. Thompson
49 N.E. 38 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1898)
Breyfogle v. Stotsenburg
47 N.E. 1057 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1897)
Weems & Waldo v. Watson
40 S.W. 722 (Texas Supreme Court, 1897)
Hutts v. Martin
41 N.E. 329 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1895)
State v. Hodgin
39 N.E. 161 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1894)
Bozeman v. Cale
35 N.E. 828 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1893)
Bennett v. Seibert
35 N.E. 35 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1893)
Brown v. Trexler
30 N.E. 418 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 N.E. 891, 124 Ind. 335, 1890 Ind. LEXIS 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snyder-v-state-ex-rel-fleming-ind-1890.