Austin v. County of Dare

83 S.E.2d 702, 240 N.C. 662, 1954 N.C. LEXIS 499
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 29, 1954
Docket24
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 83 S.E.2d 702 (Austin v. County of Dare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Austin v. County of Dare, 83 S.E.2d 702, 240 N.C. 662, 1954 N.C. LEXIS 499 (N.C. 1954).

Opinion

Bobbitt, J.

The court below denied plaintiffs’ application for a temporary restraining order, thus deciding the only question presented at the hearing. Thereafter, Dare County conveyed the lands to the United States of America for the consideration of $50,000.00. It was so stated upon the argument here. The sale and conveyance having been consummated, whether Judge Carr should have restrained the defendants, pen-dente lite, is now an academic question. It is quite obvious that a court cannot restrain the doing of that which has been already consummated. Surety Corp. v. Sharpe, 233 N.C. 644, 65 S.E. 2d 137; Saunders v. Bulla, 232 N.C. 578, 61 S.E. 2d 607; Efird v. Comrs. of Forsyth, 217 N.C. 691, 9 S.E. 2d 466. Hence, plaintiffs’ appeal must be dismissed. Cf.: Savage v. Kinston, 238 N.C. 551, 78 S.E. 2d 318.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Foreclosure of the Nine Deeds of Trust of Cornblum
727 S.E.2d 338 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2012)
In Re Cornblum
727 S.E.2d 338 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2012)
In re the Foreclosure of the Deed of Trust of Hackley
713 S.E.2d 119 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2011)
In Re Hackley
713 S.E.2d 119 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2011)
Goad v. Chase Home Finance, LLC
704 S.E.2d 1 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)
Citizens Addressing Reassignment & Education, Inc. v. Wake County Board of Education
641 S.E.2d 824 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2007)
Town of Nags Head v. Tillett
336 S.E.2d 394 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1985)
A.E.P. Industries, Inc. v. McClure
302 S.E.2d 754 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1983)
Fulton v. City of Morganton
132 S.E.2d 687 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)
Adams v. Flora Macdonald College
105 S.E.2d 68 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1958)
Topping v. HYDE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION.
104 S.E.2d 857 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1958)
Archer v. Cline
98 S.E.2d 889 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)
Green v. Briggs
92 S.E.2d 149 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)
Medlin v. Curran
91 S.E.2d 713 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 S.E.2d 702, 240 N.C. 662, 1954 N.C. LEXIS 499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-v-county-of-dare-nc-1954.