Austin v. County of Dare
This text of 83 S.E.2d 702 (Austin v. County of Dare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court below denied plaintiffs’ application for a temporary restraining order, thus deciding the only question presented at the hearing. Thereafter, Dare County conveyed the lands to the United States of America for the consideration of $50,000.00. It was so stated upon the argument here. The sale and conveyance having been consummated, whether Judge Carr should have restrained the defendants, pen-dente lite, is now an academic question. It is quite obvious that a court cannot restrain the doing of that which has been already consummated. Surety Corp. v. Sharpe, 233 N.C. 644, 65 S.E. 2d 137; Saunders v. Bulla, 232 N.C. 578, 61 S.E. 2d 607; Efird v. Comrs. of Forsyth, 217 N.C. 691, 9 S.E. 2d 466. Hence, plaintiffs’ appeal must be dismissed. Cf.: Savage v. Kinston, 238 N.C. 551, 78 S.E. 2d 318.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
83 S.E.2d 702, 240 N.C. 662, 1954 N.C. LEXIS 499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-v-county-of-dare-nc-1954.