Topping v. HYDE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION.

104 S.E.2d 857, 248 N.C. 719, 1958 N.C. LEXIS 381
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 17, 1958·No. 29·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

During the argument before us counsel for plaintiff and defendants admitted that pending the appeal the defendants have already entered into the contract, which the plaintiff seeks to enjoin. Since the contract has been made, a court cannot restrain the making of it. The question whether Judge Paul should have enjoined the making of the contract is now academic. Therefore, in accord with many decisions of this Court, the appeal will be dismissed. Efird v. Comrs. of Forsyth, 217 N.C. 691, 9 S.E. 2d 466; Austin v. Dare County, 240 N.C. 662, 83 S.E. 2d 702; Medlin v. Curran, 243 N.C. 691, 91 S.E. 2d 713; Walker v. Moss, 246 N.C. 196, 97 S.E. 2d 836; Archer v. Cline, 246 N.C. 545, 98 S.E. 2d 889.

Appeal Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Topping v. HYDE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION., 104 S.E.2d 857, 248 N.C. 719, 1958 N.C. LEXIS 381 (N.C. 1958).

104 S.E.2d 857 (Topping v. HYDE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dawson Construction Co. v. Hyde County Board of Education
118 S.E.2d 753 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1961)