Medlin v. Curran

91 S.E.2d 713, 243 N.C. 691, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 596
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 21, 1956·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PeR Cueiam.

On hearing of appeal in this Court, it was not controverted that the Board of Elections aforesaid has proceeded as authorized, so that now the matter is a fact accomplished, that is, fait ac-compli. Decisions of this Court uniformly hold that where pending an appeal to this Court from an order dissolving a temporary restraining order, the act sought to be restrained has been consummated, question as to whether defendants should have been restrained pending final hearing becomes academic, and the appeal will be dismissed. So, be it, here! See Austin v. Dare County, 240 N.C. 662, 83 S.E. 2d 702.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Medlin v. Curran, 91 S.E.2d 713, 243 N.C. 691, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 596 (N.C. 1956).

91 S.E.2d 713 (Medlin v. Curran) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adams v. Flora Macdonald College
105 S.E.2d 68 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1958)
Topping v. HYDE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION.
104 S.E.2d 857 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1958)