Medlin v. Curran
This text of 91 S.E.2d 713 (Medlin v. Curran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On hearing of appeal in this Court, it was not controverted that the Board of Elections aforesaid has proceeded as authorized, so that now the matter is a fact accomplished, that is, fait ac-compli. Decisions of this Court uniformly hold that where pending an appeal to this Court from an order dissolving a temporary restraining order, the act sought to be restrained has been consummated, question as to whether defendants should have been restrained pending final hearing becomes academic, and the appeal will be dismissed. So, be it, here! See Austin v. Dare County, 240 N.C. 662, 83 S.E. 2d 702.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 S.E.2d 713, 243 N.C. 691, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/medlin-v-curran-nc-1956.