National Surety Corp. v. Sharpe

65 S.E.2d 137, 233 N.C. 644, 1951 N.C. LEXIS 363
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 23, 1951·No. 601·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

BarNHILl, J.

As the property in controversy was in the possession of the receiver under order of court, a motion in the cause to recall the order of sale or to restrain the sale was the proper procedure. But the motion was made out of the county and out of the district without notice and before a judge who was neither the resident judge nor the judge riding the district. Said judge was without jurisdiction to hear a motion in a cause pending in Moore County. For this reason alone, if for no other, the restraining order was properly dissolved and vacated.

Furthermore, it is conceded here that pending this appeal the sale was had and the property was sold as ordered and advertised. The question the appellant now seeks to present is academic. Saunders v. Bulla, 232 N.C. 578, 61 S.E. 2d 607. The motion of the receiver to dismiss the appeal must be allowed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National Surety Corp. v. Sharpe, 65 S.E.2d 137, 233 N.C. 644, 1951 N.C. LEXIS 363 (N.C. 1951).

65 S.E.2d 137 (National Surety Corp. v. Sharpe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Foreclosure of the Deed of Trust of Hackley
713 S.E.2d 119 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2011)
In Re Hackley
713 S.E.2d 119 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2011)
Green v. Briggs
92 S.E.2d 149 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)
Austin v. County of Dare
83 S.E.2d 702 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1954)