Austin v. Continental General Tire

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Austin v. Continental General Tire

553 S.E.2d 680, 354 N.C. 344, 2001 N.C. LEXIS 1091

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedNovember 9, 2001

Docket73A01

StatusPublished

Cited by127 cases

This text of 553 S.E.2d 680 (Austin v. Continental General Tire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Austin v. Continental General Tire, 553 S.E.2d 680, 354 N.C. 344, 2001 N.C. LEXIS 1091 (N.C. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion by Judge Greene, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and remand this case to that court for further remand to the North Carolina Industrial Commission for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion and Judge Greene’s dissent below.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Justice EDMUNDS did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion by Judge Greene, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and remand this case to that court for further remand to the North Carolina Industrial Commission for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion and Judge Greene’s dissent below.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Justice EDMUNDS did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

553 S.E.2d 680, 354 N.C. 344, 2001 N.C. LEXIS 1091, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-v-continental-general-tire-nc-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack