Attorney Grievance Commission v. Robertson
862 A.2d 991, 384 Md. 154, 2004 Md. LEXIS 782
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided December 7, 2004·No. Misc. AG No. 27·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
ORDER
The parties herein have jointly petitioned this Court to reprimand the respondent, Bonar Mayo Robertson, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(b). Upon review of said Joint Petition and for reasons set forth therein, it is this 7th day of December, 2004,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the respondent, Bonar Mayo Robertson, be and he is hereby, reprimanded for misconduct in violation of Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct 1.4,1.5, and 8.4(d).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Robertson, 862 A.2d 991, 384 Md. 154, 2004 Md. LEXIS 782 (Md. 2004).
862 A.2d 991 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Robertson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Robertson
929 A.2d 576 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2007)
Attorney Grievance Comm. v. Robertson
862 A.2d 991 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2004)