Attorney Grievance Commission v. Robertson

862 A.2d 991, 384 Md. 154, 2004 Md. LEXIS 782
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedDecember 7, 2004
DocketMisc. AG No. 27
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 862 A.2d 991 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Robertson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Robertson, 862 A.2d 991, 384 Md. 154, 2004 Md. LEXIS 782 (Md. 2004).

Opinion

ORDER

The parties herein have jointly petitioned this Court to reprimand the respondent, Bonar Mayo Robertson, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(b). Upon review of said Joint Petition and for reasons set forth therein, it is this 7th day of December, 2004,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the respondent, Bonar Mayo Robertson, be and he is hereby, reprimanded for misconduct in violation of Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct 1.4,1.5, and 8.4(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Robertson
929 A.2d 576 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2007)
Attorney Grievance Comm. v. Robertson
862 A.2d 991 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
862 A.2d 991, 384 Md. 154, 2004 Md. LEXIS 782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-robertson-md-2004.