Attorney Grievance Commission v. Robertson

884 A.2d 156, 389 Md. 231, 2005 Md. LEXIS 590
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Attorney Grievance Commission v. Robertson. Read the opinion of the Court — 400 Md. 618
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided October 6, 2005·No. Misc. Docket AG No. 10·Published

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Petitioner and Respondent to place the Respondent on inactive status and Respondent’s Affidavit which accompanied said Petitioner; and

This Court having considered the Petition and the Affidavit, it is this 6th day of October, 2005,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that the Respondent, Marlene J. Robertson, is placed on inactive status, pending further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Marlene J. Robertson from the register of attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-773(d); and it is further

ORDERED that Respondent shall not be prohibited from working as a paralegal for or as an employee of an attorney or [232]*232law office, subject to appropriate supervision, and subject to further order of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Robertson, 884 A.2d 156, 389 Md. 231, 2005 Md. LEXIS 590 (Md. 2005).

884 A.2d 156 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Robertson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.