Attorney Grievance Commission v. Robertson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Robertson

867 A.2d 313, 385 Md. 63, 2005 Md. LEXIS 36

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedFebruary 7, 2005

DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 7

StatusPublished

This text of 867 A.2d 313 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Robertson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Robertson, 867 A.2d 313, 385 Md. 63, 2005 Md. LEXIS 36 (Md. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Upon review and consideration of the Joint Petition for Suspension for 90 Days filed herein, it is this 7th day of February, 2005,

[64]*64ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Bonar Mayo Robertson be, and she is hereby, suspended by consent for a period of ninety (90) days from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, beginning May 1, 2005; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Bonar Mayo Robertson from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-713, shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Upon review and consideration of the Joint Petition for Suspension for 90 Days filed herein, it is this 7th day of February, 2005,

[64]*64ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Bonar Mayo Robertson be, and she is hereby, suspended by consent for a period of ninety (90) days from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, beginning May 1, 2005; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Bonar Mayo Robertson from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-713, shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

867 A.2d 313, 385 Md. 63, 2005 Md. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-robertson-md-2005.