Attorney Grievance Comm. v. Robertson
This text of 862 A.2d 991 (Attorney Grievance Comm. v. Robertson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner
v.
Bonar Mayo ROBERTSON, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
ORDER
The parties herein have jointly petitioned this Court to reprimand the respondent, Bonar Mayo Robertson, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(b). Upon review of said Joint Petition and for reasons set forth therein, it is this 7th day of December, 2004,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the respondent, Bonar Mayo Robertson, be and he is hereby, reprimanded for misconduct in violation of Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct 1.4, 1.5, and 8.4(d).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
862 A.2d 991, 384 Md. 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-comm-v-robertson-md-2004.