Ashton ex rel. Lindsey v. Pierce

723 F.2d 70, 232 U.S. App. D.C. 367
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided November 4, 1983·No. Nos. 82-1988, 82-2048·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the Motion of the Secretary to Amend the Opinion of August 26, 1983 [716 F.2d 56] and of the responsive pleadings filed with respect thereto, it is

ORDERED by the court that the motion is granted, and the opinion of August 26, 1983 is amended as follows:

At page 67, the new paragraph:

Beginning at line 22, delete the following two sentences:

It would be anomalous indeed if Congress did not also intend to make compliance with the regulations a condition of obtaining direct annual contributions under 42 U.S.C. § 1437c (1976). We have previously recognized that these contributions are an important tool in coercing local housing agencies’ compliance with federally mandated conditions. See Knox Hill Tenant Council v. Washington, 448 F.2d 1045, 1048 (D.C.Cir.1971).

At page 67:

Beginning at line 17, delete the following sentence:

Further, it is the duty of the Department under the Contract to ensure that the Authority keeps its promises or forfeits its right to annual contributions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ashton ex rel. Lindsey v. Pierce, 723 F.2d 70, 232 U.S. App. D.C. 367 (D.C. Cir. 1983).

723 F.2d 70 (Ashton ex rel. Lindsey v. Pierce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Multi-Family Management, Inc. v. Hancock
664 A.2d 1210 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1995)
Simmons v. Charleston Housing Authority
881 F. Supp. 225 (S.D. West Virginia, 1995)
Henry Horner Mothers Guild v. Chicago Housing Authority
780 F. Supp. 505 (N.D. Illinois, 1991)
Henry Horner Mothers Guild v. Chicago Hous. Auth.
780 F. Supp. 511 (N.D. Illinois, 1991)
Curtis v. Housing Authority of the City of Oakland
746 F. Supp. 989 (N.D. California, 1990)
Tinsley v. Kemp
750 F. Supp. 1001 (W.D. Missouri, 1990)
McNeill v. New York City Housing Authority
719 F. Supp. 233 (S.D. New York, 1989)
Concerned Tenants of Father Panik Village v. Pierce
685 F. Supp. 316 (D. Connecticut, 1988)
Edwards v. District of Columbia
628 F. Supp. 333 (District of Columbia, 1985)