Multi-Family Management, Inc. v. Hancock

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Multi-Family Management, Inc. v. Hancock

664 A.2d 1210, 1995 D.C. App. LEXIS 166, 1995 WL 515242

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided August 31, 1995·No. 93-CV-346, 93-CV-383·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinions

Judgment Per Curiam.

Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part by Associate Judge FERREN at p. 1211.

Separate opinion by Associate Judge STEADMAN at p. 1224.

Separate opinion by Associate Judge FARRELL at p. 1225.

PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to Parts I., II., and III.B. of the opinion of Judge FERREN, joined in this regard by Judge STEADMAN, the order appealed from is reversed insofar as it orders payment by plaintiff to the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Pursuant to the opinion of Judge STEADMAN, joined in this regard by Judge FARRELL, the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent therewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment Per Curiam.

Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part by Associate Judge FERREN at p. 1211.

Separate opinion by Associate Judge STEADMAN at p. 1224.

Separate opinion by Associate Judge FARRELL at p. 1225.

PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to Parts I., II., and III.B. of the opinion of Judge FERREN, joined in this regard by Judge STEADMAN, the order appealed from is reversed insofar as it orders payment by plaintiff to the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Pursuant to the opinion of Judge STEADMAN, joined in this regard by Judge FARRELL, the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent therewith.

Multi-Family Management, Inc. v. Hancock, 664 A.2d 1210, 1995 D.C. App. LEXIS 166, 1995 WL 515242 (D.C. 1995).

Pincite

664 A.2d 1210 (Multi-Family Management, Inc. v. Hancock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related