Multi-Family Management, Inc. v. Hancock
This text of 664 A.2d 1210 (Multi-Family Management, Inc. v. Hancock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Judgment Per Curiam.
Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part by Associate Judge FERREN at p. 1211.
Separate opinion by Associate Judge STEADMAN at p. 1224.
Separate opinion by Associate Judge FARRELL at p. 1225.
Pursuant to Parts I., II., and III.B. of the opinion of Judge FERREN, joined in this regard by Judge STEADMAN, the order appealed from is reversed insofar as it orders payment by plaintiff to the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Pursuant to the opinion of Judge STEADMAN, joined in this regard by Judge FARRELL, the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent therewith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
664 A.2d 1210, 1995 D.C. App. LEXIS 166, 1995 WL 515242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/multi-family-management-inc-v-hancock-dc-1995.